<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My video editor of choice?  Quicktime Player (Pro).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aorensoftware.com/blog/2008/02/29/my-video-editor-of-choice-quicktime-player-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aorensoftware.com/blog/2008/02/29/my-video-editor-of-choice-quicktime-player-pro/</link>
	<description>Articles and thoughts from a couple of techmonkeys...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kalaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.aorensoftware.com/blog/2008/02/29/my-video-editor-of-choice-quicktime-player-pro/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>kalaxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aorensoftware.com/blog/2008/02/29/my-video-editor-of-choice-quicktime-player-pro/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I'm all about Final Cut, but you're right.  For the average home project it is overkill in functionality and price.  I didn't know Quicktime Pro could do so much.  I thought it just did transcoding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all about Final Cut, but you&#8217;re right.  For the average home project it is overkill in functionality and price.  I didn&#8217;t know Quicktime Pro could do so much.  I thought it just did transcoding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
